CASE OF TSAAVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF TSAAVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA(Applications nos. 13186/20 and 4 others)  JUDGMENT Art 34 • No valid basis and reason allowing the Court to refrain from examining part of the case • Complaints under Art 3 (substantive), 10 and 11 neither overlapping or peripheral but central to the case • Adjournment of the complaints not appropriate on the basis of the case-file, the alleged breaches and the substantive issues at stake • No basis for striking out the complaints under Art 37 § 1Art 3 (substantive) • Inhuman or degrading treatment • Use of kinetic impact projectiles by the police to disperse a demonstration in front of the Parliament building after its escalation injuring twenty of the applicants, neither strictly necessary nor proportionate • Need for strict regulation by Contracting States of the use of kinetic impact projectiles during demonstrations in view of their …